What Is Claude Implementation (and What It Isn't)
Claude implementation isn't using Claude. Why the implementation gap exists, the three ways it breaks, and what makes a workflow your team keeps using.
ReadWorking systems in Claude, built inside your business by people sitting with your team, and tested on your real work.
Two Kuebix lookups through the custom connector, then Claude's answer.
SAMPLE-1042 is in transit and on schedule.
Left for the team: about a minute of review.
The developer tools we build with, picked by where the system has to run.
From the Icelandic Glacial case study. Seat figures from its Claude admin analytics for the 90 days to September 24, 2026. Case study.
Not sample data. At Icelandic Glacial, the Kuebix connector went live on July 31 for freight quotes, shipment lookups, bills of lading and tracking, and within a week the finance team was using it alongside NetSuite and Vividly. Lone Star's onboarding app went live in late June on real applications, and by mid-July Soha Jivani put her time per server at "a minute per job, max." If it doesn't hold up on your data, it isn't done.
Terms for custom connectors and apps are set in the proposal. The skill libraries, prompt libraries and user guides that come with them are yours outright. Your team is trained on what we build before it goes live, and we keep building from there.

A bottled-water company went from scattered Claude accounts to one company-wide workspace, with NetSuite, Vividly and Kuebix connected. Case study

A Houston process-serving firm retired a 12-step manual onboarding routine for an app built with Claude. Case study
Custom connectors for systems that don't have a Claude connector yet, and apps where a manual routine is slowing the team down. Each is tested on your real work before it goes live.
Yes. Every build includes training before it goes live, and we keep building with your team from there.
Pricing is by proposal. The scope, the timeline and the terms for custom connectors and apps are all set in the proposal.